Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bede's commentslogin

FYI https://race-term.com is blocked by NCSC's Protective DNS service using my UK University's connection. Are you sure your domain is not blacklisted somewhere?

My work web filter is blocking it as well due to "newly registered and observed domains", but I don't think Google should be using that as a heuristic.

It is very common for malware to use recently registered addresses. They absolutely should be using it as a heuristic.

Yeah fair, I guess I should've said they shouldn't be weighting it so strongly in the heuristic (if that's even at play in this case).

Seems not to be blacklisted, but I see the domain is only 22 days old, so that'll be it I imagine.

Looking forward to the update where his vibe-coded site has been compromised and is being used as a C&C server

I hope so.

It's hard finding a good Command & Conquer server nowdays


Natch!

According to the article it's a static site served from cloudflare. That would be quite the compromise.

I recommend you read the authors' other two latest articles.

Just a data point: UK Mobile Broadband resolves the product site fine. (I have not registered with my credit card so the 'adult and malicious site' filter is still in place). As other posters have mentioned perhaps the name itself is triggering some kinds of filtering?

"As vehicles are reliable indicators of a person's social rank and wealth"

The wealthiest Europeans I know drive the cheapest vehicles. Modesty is wealth in many parts of the world, but perhaps not in California (the authors are affiliated with UC Berkeley).


> The wealthiest Europeans I know drive the cheapest vehicles

That may well be true of the people you know, but in general the relationship is exactly what one would expect: the higher people's income, the more expensive their car purchases.

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/economic-bulletin/articles/2...

Full paper: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/economic-bulletin/articles/2...


However, there is another factor at play, which is that people who are more image conscious drive nicer cars at the same level of income/wealth, and in my experience, people who are more image conscious also tend to act more like jerks.

> in my experience, people who are more image conscious also tend to act more like jerks.

That has been my experience as well. Ive experienced people who are more image conscious to appear to be in an imaginary competition with others and they tend to act accordingly.


Thanks for sharing data. I suspect this effect is heavily stratified across demographics.

After a point, how much someone chooses to spend on their car is about their values more than their wealth.

I once lived in a street with many parked cars worth almost as much the houses of their owners. They were clearly bought (well, financed) as status symbols. I now live in a more affluent, desirable area where the cars are much more modest despite higher wealth and social status of their owners (doctors, scientists etc).


That's income, not wealth though. Some wealthy people don't have very high incomes.

I would have guessed vehicle as predicting ethics more than bank balance. Dumb Toyota and minivan more trustworthy than a Porsche, Dodge Charger, or Cyber Truck.

>The wealthiest Europeans I know drive the cheapest vehicles.

Yeah, that's a fun meme, I'm sure it still gets a lot of likes on Instagram.

The data shows otherwise, however.


This really does seem to call into question the credibility of this study.

Why would an rando anecdote (which another sibling comment has proven does not reflect the broader reality) call into question an actual study? The latter may be garbage, or not, but it starts with a much better claim to credibility.

I would say it's not really a "rando anecdote", but the whole basis of the relationship of the first actual study in the paper.

To quote the paper:

"Our first two studies were naturalistic field studies, and examined whether upper-class individuals behave more unethically than lower-class individuals while driving. In study 1, we investigated whether upper-class drivers were more likely to cut off other vehicles at a busy four-way intersection with stop signs on all sides. As vehicles are reliable indicators of a person's social rank and wealth (15), we used observers’ codes of vehicle status (make, age, and appearance) to index drivers’ social class."


They dont drive flash vehicles but they still do not drive junk. Thier car might be 20+ years old, but it is still a great car. Someone driving a well-maintained 90s BMW gathers more respect than anyone driving the latest model.

Clarkson had a line about estate owners driving "ancestral transport", invariably a land rover as old as the trees it lives amongst.

Ultimate statement about european land owners driving ancient vehicles: https://youtu.be/R8-9oIq1hxw?si=Ogg7C5MjFRoDdC9R


criminals can’t deposit their money into a bank, but they can buy a $200,000 Lambo.

>criminals can’t deposit their money into a bank

They can. It just gets reported to FinCEN, which might attract unwanted attention. The same applies to buying a $200k lambo with cash, which has to be reported to the IRS[1], on top of being registered with the state DMV.

[1] https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employe...


Not that I know about these things...

Some people buy used hot rods on Facebook Marketplace for around $100k, then trade them in to a dealership. They claim they only paid $5k for the car and their labor increased the value to $100k, then use that trade-in value to get the car they actually want.


They just set up financing. You can definitely buy cars with drug money.

I worked with a client that sold stuff that was legal, but directed a lot of ad traffic to very questionable stuff and made a crazy amount of money from it.

Because of this there was always some risk of the government locking up bank accounts, so physical assets were purchased and spread around to avoid seizure of all finances which can prevent a person from fighting a legal battle.


This is also a common trope for the North American West Coast including California, but I haven’t looked for actual data to confirm it

Poor people aren't buying Ferraris and Bentleys, and yet plenty of them sell, so I think you're taking anecdote as data.

The opposite of modesty is not "buying a Ferrari". Anyone at any level of wealth can be immodest.

Not saying I agree with GP, but your point doesn't hold up.


There’s still a strong cultural bias though that is likely location dependent. I have lived in very wealthy towns for which there was not a single Ferrari or Bentley around (or any other luxury car for that matter). That ownership of an expensive car requires some degree of wealth is absolutely clear, but the inverse doesn’t follow —- average cars don’t indicate average income. It could be that the study finds that certain ethical biases are related to people who buy expensive cars, which is not the same as saying that certain ethical biases are related to wealthy people. Millionaires who drive Toyotas could simply exhibit different ethical standards than millionaires who drive Ferraris.

A frank conversation with a luxury car dealer might surrise you. People are buying these things on credit mostly, and are definitely not rich.

5-10 year old used Bentleys are ~50-60K well within the realm of a normal middle class individual.

Arent bentleys designed to be driven by a separate driver not by the owner? :)

Compared to pricing, maybe.

But driving a bently is "some work", so I would rather prefer the small e-vehicle :-))


I think the point was many people are car enthusiasts and can technically afford the maintenance if they want it that bad.

In fact, it usually takes them down the path of flipping the cars and falling up instead of down.


My fault, with >some work< I meant only the driving experience / effort, not any of the "maintenance / support" related issues (-:

Short version: I would go rather in leight-weight E-vehicle than in a heavy bently, navigating like an aircraft carrier


two doors down from my shop is an antique bently restorer. he's sold a few, but he still has 5 frames that he's working on. after all the custom panel and interior work and chasing after the few remaining parts available in all kinds of odd international corners he's still quite underwater.

Sucks to be that guy? I'm not sure what your point is. You haven't given enough information to assess much. It's also likely you don't know all the numbers or you'd be working there.

> Poor people aren't buying Ferraris and Bentleys

No, but sometimes they can finance a very (comparatively) expensive car for way too many years at an insane percentage just to appear wealthier than they are. And that stomps on the study just as much as millionaires driving a Camry IMO.


It’s also in California. People flaunt wealth outside of cali though.

I too would far rather bear a token cost than have my sessions rot silently beneath my feet. I usually have ~5 running CC sessions, some of which I may leave for a week or two of inactivity at a time.


Yes, me too. This is good to know, but basically it means I can’t rely on old conversations any more. Using a “handoff” file to try and start a new conversation is effectively the same thing as what they did under the hood. So yeah, you can’t rely on old conversations to be as informed when you pick it back up.


same here, and I suspect there are dozens of us


Thanks for publicising. I recently decided not to renew my Backblaze in favour of 'self hosting' encrypted backups outside the US. But I was horrified to learn that my git repos may not have been backed up, nor my Dropbox, whose subscription I also recently cancelled. Good riddance.

My experience using restic has been excellent so far, snapshots take 5 mins rather than 30 mins with backblaze's Mac client. I just hope I can trust it…


> Probably obvious for many, but I didn't realize ACs don't transport any air into the room, but just moves it around

I had the same epiphany as you days after acquiring a CO2 monitor. Most people notice poor indoor air quality from proxies such as humidity and temperature. AC (without ventilation) eliminates these and tricks our senses very effectively, giving us cool and fresh feeling indoor spaces full of CO2 and devoid of oxygen.


> There’s another distance limit at work here, and that is the speed of light. It takes milliseconds for the signal in your phone to reach the hotel above ground and be handed over to the mobile network.

It takes roughly 100us for light to travel 30km – Can you explain how the speed of light is relevant here?


.. and in 1mS it travels 300km. Maybe they just want to sound technical, somewhat to match the rest of the article. They certainly didn't use chat gpt, so maybe that's a good thing.


For BAM this could be a good place to start: https://www.htslib.org/benchmarks/CRAM.html

Happy to discuss further


Amazing, thank you!

I will take a look as soon as I get a chance. Looking at the BAM format, it looks like the tokenization portion will be easy. Which means I can focus on the compression side, which is more interesting.


Another format that might be worth looking at in the bioinformatics world is hdf5. It's sort of a generic file format, often used for storing multiple related large tables. It has some built-in compression (gzip IIRC) but supports plugins. There may be an opportunity to integrate the self-describing nature of the hdf5 format with the self-describing decompression routines of openZL.



Author of [0] here. Congratulations and well done for resisting. Eager to try it!

Edit: Have you any specific advice for training a fasta compressor beyond that given in e.g. "Using OpenZL" (https://openzl.org/getting-started/using-openzl/)


A Zstd maintainer clarified this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45251544

> Ultimately, Zstd is a byte-oriented compressor that doesn't understand the semantics of the data it compresses


Fascinating, thank you.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: