They can be easily replaced. I suspect we are just engaging in a form of self deception by thinking these choices we make are more than arbitrary decisions driven by nothing but our taste...
> There is a clear multi-step skills roadmap everyone is following with expectations per role/department
interesting... I suppose this requires someone at the company actually knowing what the roadmap and desired end goal should be, I feel like exactly this is lacking in a lot of places right now
In my humble human opinion everything digital has been or shortly will be conquered by AI.
You can either embrace it, learn to how to use and deploy AI or try to find a way out into the real world, until robotics will inevitably catch you in several years, for some professions with manual aspect you could have maybe decades of time.
did you consider tier 2, semiconductor suppliers qualcomm, nxp or go tier 3 - arm? I would say these will allow more technical depth than tier 1s, but will remove you from the end customer product, and some people find that unsatisfying.
customer facing companies with engineering culture also come to mind, apple, google etc. I assume you are in Europe? you have Bosch Research, Fraunhofer or Dolby in US, this might overlap with your stated experience.
I dont have experience in quants or trading but I heard they can go pretty deep and hard.
Thank you for sharing your response. Yes, I have considered and very much want to work with processors(any kind) making companies. However, I am not getting any interviews. It might be the case CV is not strong enough when there is large pool of experts are available in the market.
I focus more on specs, product and outside behavior these days. Colleague showed me a fancy plugin he made for emacs today at work. I congratulated his efforts and mentioned I dont open text editors anymore :shrug: ...
for ai research, safety, aerospace, military, trading, gamedev .. those will probably still need coding for a bit longer.