It's not that, is for: Ensuring certain vetted implementation method is used. E.g. you always want tests or docs, or always done.

Caching certain scripts so it's not reinvented each time with risk of error/need reviewing.

I click through to a few links and cannot find who is doing the matching

Liquid already has confidentiality. I think the question is: how could they coerce the federated authorization to unfreeze peg-out to Bitcoin.

So like an option....

Amazon puff piece

The author is Corey Quinn who is usually... not slow to criticise Amazon when they deserve it.

His business is cloud cost engineering and his natural enemy (or best friend since it generates so much consulting) is AWS's managed NAT gateway: https://www.lastweekinaws.com/blog/the-aws-managed-nat-gatew...

The review includes the following, which I doubt was approved by AWS marketing:

> AWS gets a lot wrong. They have ridiculous marketing campaigns, they build five services that do mostly the same thing and then name them like malevolent toddlers, and they've never found a partner they couldn't find a way to compete with.

(Followed by grudging praise which seems earned).

Then that's just CSV?

It's turtles all the way down, mate.

Turtle-separated values? I thought TSV meant tabs.

LoL

Wow even the elves will get replaced by AI

So probably actually accurate given those have heavy insider trading