Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ukprogrammer's commentslogin

If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle

Similarity to tmux is the point

I've been dailying this (inside tmux!) for multi-agent orchestration and for state detection for agentic fleet orchestration, it's excellent. Highly recommend!


Without AI your 10 years of experience is of lower utility than an AI wielding junior with 2 years of experience

Don't blame the job market, take some responsibility over your atrophying skillset


GLM cannot use vision like Opus can. This is not a useful comparison.


I see your point. Just the fact that one model does have vision and one does not might be an interesting point of comparison, however.


employment is slavery lol


Someone who would compare React to Kubernetes instead of React (Facebook) and Vue.js (Google) does not have enough domain knowledge to provide an informed opinion on this matter

Kubernetes is the industry standard cluster orchestrator for a reason - it's fantastic


ITT hacker news rebuilds a blockchain from scratch


With LLMs now being responsible for the physical typing of code and mundane plumbing tasks, this is a wise direction to go into

Our human ability is not defined by our _absolute_ output, but, by the quality of the _delta_ applied to an engineering artefact

Great engineers obsess over every keystroke

With LLMs, a much smaller number of keystrokes can create a much larger and more positively impactful delta

Every delta to the codebase can tell us some informational property about the behaviour of the system and storing that information WILL prove to be useful in the future


This is what you get when you sell a lifetime product

Tailwind UI is a phenomenal product, but, there's a simple mathematical reason you cannot sell code like in this way to create a sustainable business


skill issue

same way a lesser engineer might say they cannot do X or Y


deepfake edits are a feature, not a bug


its the same as banning knives because they can be used to hurt people. we shouldn't ban tools.


with that analogy, OP's solution is akin to banning the use of knives to harm people, as opposed to banning the knife itself


If I undestood correctly he's unsharpening knives.


Or making knives that turn into overcooked noodles if you try to use them on anything except vegetables and acceptable meats


and who decides if I want to use a knife to cut mushrooms instead? see where I am going, there are (or could exist) legit cases when you need to use it in a non-standard way, one that the model authors didn't anticipate.


But we do ban tools sometimes: you can't bring a knife to a concert, for good reason.


> we shouldn't ban tools

When I see the old BuT FrEe SpEeCH argument repurposed to impinge civil rights I start warming to the idea of banning tools.

Alternately "Chemical weapons don't kill people, people with chemical weapons kill people"


Not really, its like banning chemistry sets cause they may be used to create chemical weapons.


Not sure the comparison works when it does all the work for you

I've had very little success mumbling "you are an expert chemist..." to test tubes and raw materials.


In this case, image generation and editing AI is a tool which we managed just fine with until three years ago, and where the economic value of that tool remains extremely questionable despite it being a remarkable improvement in the state of the art.

As a propaganda tool it seems quite effective, but for that it's gone from "woo free-speech" to "oh no epistemic collapse".


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: