Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> the less likely it is that every font covers all the symbols that someone might find important

That is a meaningless requirement. The symbols I use on a daily basis already don't exist in a single font. Operating systems handle font fallback just fine.



Fair enough but there is no common fallback font that is used by all systems (win, osx, linux, android ...) as a default.

Take this page for example: http://emojipedia.org/faq/ Only a fraction of the emojis is displayed on my laptop. (maybe 20%)


As a data point, my laptop shows every emoji through Unicode 8.0 just fine.


> there is no common fallback font that is used by all systems (win, osx, linux, android ...) as a default.

Again, meaningless. Why should there have to be a common fallback font?


to make sure that even the most idiosyncratic choice of characters can be displayed everywhere according to the intention of the person who picked them.


Unicode supplies sample glyphs for all characters. That's plenty.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: