>I agree with you, but seeing the number of proponents of Enterprise Java there are, it's clear that there are a significant number of programmers who prefer verbosity and extra abstractions --- although IMHO not necessarily because it's actually better.
Even Enterprise Java wasn't verbose for the sake of it (I say "wasn't" because modern enterprise Java can be more like modern functional style than Go).
It was more verbose because it added tons of options and flexibility while keeping with the OO style, so everything was pluggable and configurable and factorable. But that's something else than Go style verbosity.
Even Enterprise Java wasn't verbose for the sake of it (I say "wasn't" because modern enterprise Java can be more like modern functional style than Go).
It was more verbose because it added tons of options and flexibility while keeping with the OO style, so everything was pluggable and configurable and factorable. But that's something else than Go style verbosity.