Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Especially when manufacturers and vendors start selling devices with different Android versions, as they are now.

Someone that physically breaks their Motorolla DroidX running 2.2 and buys a replacement Samsung Galaxy that runs 1.5 (now 1.6 I hear), and then realizes that the majority of the apps that they purchased aren't compatible with the lower version of the phone, and that the phone has a terrible UI (compared to the improved 2.2), is going to be mighty disappointed in both the carrier and the Android name.

The average user doesn't know how to root and upgrade the phone software to unofficial versions. The average user only knows that it is Android, and that Android now "sucks" in that situation.



If they downgrade from a DroidX to a Samsung Galaxy, and it sucks, are they going to blame the OS or the phone?

Put another way, are you more likely to hear "My phone sucks" or "This lower version number of the OS I was previously happy with sucks"?

The market will drum out the bad apples who try to leave their Android phones stuck at ancient versions.


The same way people has complained for years about Linux drivers support. They don't care their printer or modems, or webcams manufacturers don't give technical info about their devices, they just want their devices to work as they are used to.

Ironically, now Linux support way more devices than Windows, and let you do things that no commercial vendor is going to let you do(e.g I have used an old scanner as spectrogram with very little money).


You're right but I think they end up with the same result. Whether or not it's "my phone sucks" or "my OS sucks," the result is just going to be people leaving for the main competitor (i.e., Apple).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: