Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You are not the only one.

This piece is almost a self-parody. Here's a quote:

Get him started on the subject, ale in hand at The Garden Gate, or on those rare occasions he called in to correct a glib host on talk radio, and Van Allen could go. “We’re an island of, what, 96,000 sq miles? Population that’s sky-high, growing, and the same number of houses we had 40 years ago. Too many people! Not enough houses! Me and most of my friends, we’re all in the same boat, long-termers, a community hundreds of thousands strong, not crashed in the gutter, people in paid employment, and all fucked – have been for years. It’s the way the legislation is … We didn’t choose this friggin’ path. This is the Housing Act of 1996 and every bullshit piece of legislation that’s been put in place since. It’s not our path. I fought it for years and then I threw in the towel. Said to myself: ‘Fuck it, I’m going camping.’”

This is like a McMansion hell of words.

I can't even capture it all with HN's markdown syntax. You have to look at the article. To see the real italics. To see the embedded link.

But you can see the wild flips in perspective, tense and syntax. You can see the nested quote marks at the end. You can see "sq miles".

Riddley Walker is easier to parse than this.

By contrast, I'm currently reading a book by Peter Hessler. He also practices non-linear storytelling. But his words are clear and carefully placed (or well edited). The narrative is not random. There is a continual sense that the reader's trust in the author will be rewarded.



It's interesting that nearly all of what you've included from the article is a direct quote.

The author could have editorialized it, but those aren't his words.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: