As an attorney, I love when I get a client like this who has tons and tons of records.
I recently had a case where my client, who uses a service dog, was denied a hotel reservation because of the dog. The hotel’s attorney called me and said “I spoke with the other person, she said this never happened, and he never said it was a service animal.” Well, my client, due to his disability, uses a telephone system that records all of his calls. I sent over the recording, and it clearly showed that he identified a service animal, and the person just said “no.” Now that lawyer knows his client’s a liar.
Olympus Telephone Recording Device (TP-8) costs something like $25.
It's simply brilliant. It plugs into any recorder with 3.5mm plug and because it's device you have in your ear it works with any call (normal phone call, WhatsApp whatever). Reporters routinely use it with Olympus voice recorders to make phone interviews.
Not looking for legal advice but: how does that work in the context that the other party is recording my call? If I phone a service provider, they tell me calls are recorded for training and monitoring purposes - does this prove they've given consent to both parties recording?
> If I phone a service provider, they tell me calls are recorded for training and monitoring purposes
Yes. If you're recording a call and it says "Your calls may be recorded" from their end that would be an open and shut argument that they've given permission for you to record the call.
I don’t understand how it works. It only has one jack. What do you plug it into? How do you get any audio into the earphone AND record both sides of the call? Or is it just like any microphone and you have to put the phone on speaker and basically record the ambiant audio?
Google has actually been fighting call recording apps for years. California is a two-party consent state, but most states are one-party consent (and many countries don't have legal restrictions at all). They're basically enforcing California law globally. It's extremely frustrating to have your phone force-upgraded only to lose important features.
I recently had a case where my client, who uses a service dog, was denied a hotel reservation because of the dog. The hotel’s attorney called me and said “I spoke with the other person, she said this never happened, and he never said it was a service animal.” Well, my client, due to his disability, uses a telephone system that records all of his calls. I sent over the recording, and it clearly showed that he identified a service animal, and the person just said “no.” Now that lawyer knows his client’s a liar.