same here with my initial first take on the name. I was doing a internet search for something recently and realized this spirit of taking an existing word and deliberately overloading it in a different context rather than coining a new term with a distinct phonemes is slowly mucking up our language to disambiguate by keywords alone. It's hard work to invent new words and I get it can slow the adoption or recognition of something if the name hasn't been settled yet and it's tempting to just skip over that whole process by leapfrogging out of the mental wrestling by coopting an existing word and append a new definition to it.
Earlier in life I used to lament the lack of uniqueness to words and the existence of synonyms but later began appreciate the overlap because having the ability to talk about something with a variety of phonemes seemed to help create some conceptual distance in a conversation that was otherwise obscured by close sounding words.
But this almost lazy reuse of existing words, I'm still not sure how I feel about it now that I'm aware of its costs.
Earlier in life I used to lament the lack of uniqueness to words and the existence of synonyms but later began appreciate the overlap because having the ability to talk about something with a variety of phonemes seemed to help create some conceptual distance in a conversation that was otherwise obscured by close sounding words.
But this almost lazy reuse of existing words, I'm still not sure how I feel about it now that I'm aware of its costs.