> "That fact that [Inman] wants to react by advocating net war against me and accusing my mom of bestiality makes him lower than the low"
Reading the offending piece on theoatmeal.com it appears the mother mentioned is that of FunnyJunk owner rather than Carreon.
The leading text before the claimed offence:
>"You want ME to pay YOU $20,000 for hosting MY unlicensed comics on YOUR shitty website for the past 3 years?"
Considering the cheque was to be made payable to FunnyJunk (as requested in the letter), and as Carreon does not own the "shitty website" it unlikely the image depicts his mother at all but that of FunnyJunk's owner(s).
You could argue that the whole blog post is addressed to FunnyJunk, not Carreon.
Reading the offending piece on theoatmeal.com it appears the mother mentioned is that of FunnyJunk owner rather than Carreon.
The leading text before the claimed offence:
>"You want ME to pay YOU $20,000 for hosting MY unlicensed comics on YOUR shitty website for the past 3 years?"
Considering the cheque was to be made payable to FunnyJunk (as requested in the letter), and as Carreon does not own the "shitty website" it unlikely the image depicts his mother at all but that of FunnyJunk's owner(s).
You could argue that the whole blog post is addressed to FunnyJunk, not Carreon.