That's my point. It doesn't say how they are going to get paid. While it certainly is an example of caveat emptor (or should that be caveat vendItor? The lines blur...), misleading someone via omission is in my opinion just as bad as not telling the truth, if you have an impression via the sales process that payment would be prompt.
Before you object, consider the reaction of the waffle shop owner if he had been told that it would take 3 months to pay for his services, but he still had to outlay capital to provide that service. Does it seem likely he would have gone ahead with the Groupon campaign? One cannot say with absolutely certainty, but I think it likely he would not have proceeded!
Before you object, consider the reaction of the waffle shop owner if he had been told that it would take 3 months to pay for his services, but he still had to outlay capital to provide that service. Does it seem likely he would have gone ahead with the Groupon campaign? One cannot say with absolutely certainty, but I think it likely he would not have proceeded!