Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I’m surprised no one is commenting on how cheap this is compared to Opus 4.x and GPT-5.5.

$1.25 / $2.50 for every M input and output tokens.

Is this is a smaller less powerful model? What am I missing?



It is cheaper per token, but it seems to reason a lot more, leading to costs similar to 4.20, but performance is better (similar to what 4.20 had[0]).

Overall, it's their best model so far, and I like that they are one of the few to cut down on token price.

[0]: https://aibenchy.com/compare/x-ai-grok-4-20-medium/x-ai-grok...


They dropped the output cost, butthe input cost is relatively high. This is a recent trend. Seen with DeepSeek 4 Pro as well.


At work, I've found a strong moral resistance within my colleagues against anything involving Elon Musk and which data he allows to be used to train his models.

Look at the comments. They're here, too. "So, we have: - claude for corps and gov - codex for devs - grok for what, roleplay, racism? Those are the two things I've ever heard grok associated with around me."


Yes, it’s a significantly less powerful model, that’s why.


Grok is associated with Elon Musk. If we used $TSLA profit margin as a proxy, it looks like it's no longer as high. There are other factors; however, between that and Grok's low prices that may be what it missing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: