I am a fan actually, and I don't think my views are incompatible with his. I do have reservations of the typical use of "natural law" arguments though. One can construct a natural law argument for just about any premise one wants.

> I am a fan actually, and I don't think my views are incompatible with his.

I'm unable to reconcile your comment with what I understand to be John Lock's theory regarding property rights. They seem incompatible to me.

My recollection of his work is nothing but vague memories at this point, so there's a good chance I'm completely off in my assessment.