Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Just to put this level of paranoia in some perspective, Stalin's purges hit a massive 1% of the population. 8 million is 2.5%.

This is so paranoid that it is hard to comprehend. If you think that 2.5% of the population is out to get you, then you should probably be very carefully considering the possibility that the problem is actually you.



His purges, yes. But that is far more extreme than keeping a file on someone, so I don't think it's a good comparison.

But consider the political monitoring - certainly a vastly higher number were likely considered potential risks to be registered "just in case" under Stalins regime as wel.

I don't know if there are any estimates of the number of people under active surveillance and "on lists" in the Soviet Union, but consider the East German Stasi, which at one point at least had 2.5% of the population of DDR acting as informants (this is a reasonably conservative estimate), and had files on about 1/3 of the total population of the DDR.


Even more than 2.5% if you exclude children and people over 65.


Why would you exclude senior citizens? AKA one of the most politically active demographics in the country.


Seniors don't riot.


However, they do break into secure nuclear weapons facilities....


Or insecure nuclear weapons facilities, in that case.


During recent riots in Turkey seniors were supporting younger protesters - bringing food, offering medical help etc.


And? Rioting is not the sole source of "threats to national security".

Indeed older people often form the intellectual leadership for all sorts of movements/organisations, good and bad. Especially in cultures that have maintained their respect for elders.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: